Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected10 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

10 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Morzine is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Effectively tied

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Morzine is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeMorzine
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Morzine is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago1.5 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Morzine. strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.

Why Chamonix leads Morzine Snow reliability +2.6 pts and Access +1.6 pts
Snow now -3.2Snow reliability +2.6Access +1.6Terrain fit +0.6
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeMorzine

Main uncertaintyThe lead over Morzine is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIncrease lift system weight from 14 to 22 and Morzine becomes the leading option.

Lead margin1.5pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier5 options

5 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

Lift systemMorzine

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 22 and Morzine becomes the leading option.

14 → 22
Family & valueMorzine

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 26 and Morzine becomes the leading option.

12 → 26
TerrainMorzine

Reduce terrain weight from 22 to 5 and Morzine becomes the leading option.

22 → 5
SnowMorzine

Reduce snow weight from 24 to 4 and Morzine becomes the leading option.

24 → 4
Why Chamonix leads Morzine · 1.5 pts
Current opportunity-3.2 pts
Terrain+2.7 pts
Snow+2.6 pts
Lift system-2.6 pts
Access+1.6 pts
Scale+1.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Morzine

#2 · Portes du Soleil · Switzerland

Decision73/100
Fit77/100
Now53/100
Quality6.3/10
Now53308 cm upperReliability5858/100Terrain8585/100Access7094 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit76.586% weight Now53.014% weight Decision73.3/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow58/100 · 73% evidence 13.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain72/100 · 80% evidence 15.9 / 22.0 pts
Scale88/100 · 100% evidence 14.0 / 16.0 pts
Lift system98/100 · 8% evidence 13.7 / 14.0 pts
Access70/100 · 68% evidence 8.4 / 12.0 pts
Family & value88/100 · 41% evidence 10.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 65%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow308 cm 42.9 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow9 cm 1.1 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow188 cm 9.0 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useFamily trips · 79/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area580 km · 1,269 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m8%Best transfer94 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 780% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 85/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 58/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Breuil Cervinia

#3 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now22/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.479% weight Now22.021% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#4 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Eben im Pongau

#5 · Eben im Pongau · Austria

Decision57/100
Fit57/100
Now0/100
Quality5.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4444/100Terrain5858/100Access7650 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.8100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision56.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow44/100 · 73% evidence 10.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain41/100 · 80% evidence 9.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale46/100 · 100% evidence 7.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.6 / 14.0 pts
Access76/100 · 68% evidence 9.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 66/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area6 km · 726 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer50 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 58/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 44/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Maurach am Achensee

#6 · Maurach · Austria

Decision56/100
Fit56/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4949/100Terrain5555/100Access7560 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision56.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow49/100 · 73% evidence 11.8 / 24.0 pts
Terrain70/100 · 80% evidence 15.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale49/100 · 100% evidence 7.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system48/100 · 68% evidence 6.8 / 14.0 pts
Access75/100 · 68% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts
Family & value44/100 · 41% evidence 5.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 59/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area11 km · 890 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m19%Best transfer60 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 49/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Polsa di Bretonico

#7 · Altopiano Brentonico · Italy

Decision50/100
Fit50/100
Now0/100
Quality3.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3737/100Terrain5555/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit50.2100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision50.2/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow37/100 · 37% evidence 10.0 / 27.3 pts
Terrain60/100 · 52% evidence 15.0 / 25.0 pts
Scale50/100 · 100% evidence 9.1 / 18.2 pts
Lift system41/100 · 68% evidence 6.6 / 15.9 pts
Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 54/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area22 km · 388 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 37/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Stalden

#8 · Staldenried Gspon · Switzerland

Decision47/100
Fit47/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5757/100Terrain4343/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit46.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision46.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow57/100 · 37% evidence 15.5 / 27.3 pts
Terrain47/100 · 44% evidence 11.8 / 25.0 pts
Scale29/100 · 100% evidence 5.3 / 18.2 pts
Lift system31/100 · 8% evidence 4.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value70/100 · 28% evidence 9.5 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 39%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 53/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area5 km · 328 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 43/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 57/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Realp

#9 · Realp · Switzerland

Decision46/100
Fit46/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6060/100Terrain4343/100Access31123 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit45.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision45.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow60/100 · 37% evidence 14.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain7/100 · 31% evidence 1.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale10/100 · 85% evidence 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system88/100 · 68% evidence 12.3 / 14.0 pts
Access31/100 · 68% evidence 3.7 / 12.0 pts
Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 12.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 49%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 62/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area1 km · 142 m verticalBest transfer123 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 43/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and strong terrain profile; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 60/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Bedretto

#10 · Bedretto · Switzerland

Decision44/100
Fit44/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5757/100Terrain3939/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit44.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision44.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow57/100 · 37% evidence 15.6 / 27.3 pts
Terrain2/100 · 31% evidence 0.4 / 25.0 pts
Scale3/100 · 85% evidence 0.5 / 18.2 pts
Lift system87/100 · 68% evidence 13.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 41%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 65/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area0 km · 60 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 39/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and strong terrain profile; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 57/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyMorzinePortes du SoleilBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalEben im PongauEben im PongauMaurach am AchenseeMaurachPolsa di BretonicoAltopiano BrentonicoStaldenStaldenried GsponRealpRealpBedrettoBedretto
Assessment
Decision score 75/10073/10064/10064/10057/10056/10050/10047/10046/10044/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage77/10075/10064/10057/10056/10050/10047/10046/10044/100
Current opportunity 29/10053/100clear advantage22/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/106.3/109.2/10clear advantage8.7/105.5/104.0/103.5/10–––
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumLowLowLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10071/10076/10078/10072/10038/10030/10035/10079/10075/100
Typical daytime high 3°C3°C-2°Cclear advantage1°C3°C5°C5°C3°C3°C1°C
Typical snow/freezing level ––––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-3°C-7°C-6°C-4°C-2°C-2°C-3°C-6°C-8°C
Rating 8.1/107.4/108.1/107.4/105.8/106.2/106.4/10–––
Area size class 150–250 km250+ km250+ km100–150 km20 km or less20 km or less20–50 km20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less
Ability profile advancedintermediateadvancedadvancednoviceadvancedadvancedadvancednovicenovice
Price class highhighhighhighavgavgavg––avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km580 kmclear advantage322 km142 km6 km11 km22 km5 km1 km0 km
Lowest point 1,000 m985 m1,562 m1,472 m875 m980 m1,195 m1,865 mclear advantage1,538 m1,550 m
Highest point 3,842 m2,254 m3,899 m3,573 m1,601 m1,870 m1,583 m2,193 m1,680 m1,610 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,269 m2,337 m2,101 m726 m890 m388 m328 m142 m60 m
Blue pistes 34%53%23%22%67%9%31%30%100%100%
Red pistes 44%36%68%62%33%73%49%70%0%0%
Black pistes 22%10%8%16%0%18%20%0%0%0%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%8%92%clear advantage57%0%19%––––
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%0%21%clear advantage0%0%0%––––
Piste-mix diversity 97/10085/10074/10084/10092/10069/10094/10088/100––
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage58/10051/10068/10014/10064/100––––
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage6%6%2%0%10%––––
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Snow consistency ––––––––––
Late-winter retention ––––––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––––––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentileWell above typical+780% vs average · 100th percentileWell below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile–––––––
Valley snow versus typical ––Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile–––––––
Open slopes versus typical ––Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile–––––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm9 cm19 cm–––––––
Mid-mountain snow 99 cm188 cmclear advantage53 cm–––––––
Mountain snow 145 cm308 cmclear advantage75 cm–––––––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality ––9.6/10–––––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes ––7%–––––––
Open lifts ––––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km–298 pph/km289 pph/km992 pph/km481 pph/km532 pph/km–1,300 pph/km3,050 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage 0.48×–0.28×0.28×0.50×0.34×0.20×–0.60×1.00×clear advantage
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift3.5 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift1.5 km/lift2.2 km/lift3.1 km/lift1.3 km/lift0.1 km/lift0.2 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 4°C4°C1°C1°C4°C4°C4°C7°C-7°C-1°C
Maximum temperature 11°C12°C9°C6°C10°C10°C8°C16°C-2°C4°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability –family–family–family––––
Piste variety slopes–slopesslopes––––––
Off-piste offpiste–offpiste–––––––
Cross-country ––––––––––
Lift network ––liftslifts––––––
Mountain restaurants ––restaurantsrestaurants––––––
Après-ski ––apresskiapresski––––––
Public transport transittransittransit–transittransit––––
Best airport transfer 63 min94 min104 min441 min50 min60 min––123 min–
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer370 km/h transferclear advantage186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer7 km/h transfer11 km/h transfer––0 km/h transfer–