Locally variable Alpine setup
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
Snow reports, Alpine forecasts and resort intelligence.
Track current snow, incoming weather and mountain conditions across the Alps — then see which resorts have the strongest supported setup.
A concise Alpine overview: what changed, where current evidence is strongest, and which deeper report to open next.
A concise Alpine overview: what changed, where current evidence is strongest, and which deeper report to open next.
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
The broad pattern sets the context; resort-level evidence reveals where the clearest mountain choices emerge.
Promising mountain-weather window
lower wind exposure supports a more usable mountain window.
Inspect leader →Promising mountain-weather window
lower wind exposure supports a more usable mountain window.
Inspect resort →Strong current mountain signal
several current Alpine signals combine more favourably than for comparable resorts.
Inspect resort →Regional contrasts show the broad setup; transition signals show where that setup is most fragile.
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
No single broad regional edge dominates; altitude, exposure and timing remain decisive.
For Hafjell, local conditions deserve extra verification before treating the wider Alpine pattern as representative.
Outside the Alpine baseline Vuokatti Current evidence is unusually strong · 100/100For Vuokatti, the signal is stronger than the Alpine baseline; treat it as a local advantage, not a broad regional forecast.
Live and forecast mountain signals are kept separate from enduring resort Fit, so a short weather event cannot rewrite the resort itself.
Snow-memory and snow-caution signals are deliberately suppressed outside the winter decision season.
Incomplete evidence is not converted into an artificial zero or a hidden penalty; the interface simply avoids making a stronger claim than the available mountain signal supports.
Compare precipitation and mid-mountain temperature before opening the full maps.
Daily total
Mid-mountain max
Snow, precipitation and temperature tables for verification.
24hSince yesterday: lead changed from Oz en Oisans to Piau Engaly
Leading current high-mountain snow report: Piau Engaly with about 350 cm on the upper mountain.
residual high-mountain snow can affect summer mountain conditions above 2,500 m, but it does not imply that ski terrain is open or skiable.
| Skiresort | Snow (cm) | Temp (°C) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| lower | upper | lo | hi | |
| Piau Engaly | 130 | 350 | 1 | 7 |
| Les Deux Alpes | 40 | 340 | 2 | 7 |
| Les Arcs | 86 | 300 | 3 | 7 |
| Lauchernalp | 70 | 299 | -5 | -2 |
| Montgenevre | 240 | 260 | 3 | 9 |
| Chamonix | 30 | 259 | 3 | 7 |
| Murren | 34 | 252 | 2 | 7 |
| Meribel | 185 | 250 | 3 | 6 |
| Saint Martin de Belleville | 185 | 250 | 3 | 7 |
| La Tania | 184 | 250 | 3 | 7 |
24hSince yesterday: lead changed from Pietranera Rovegno to Haukelifjell
Strongest visible 48h precipitation signal: Haukelifjell at about 129 mm.
a strong short-range precipitation signal can reduce visibility and mountain comfort; compare temperature and webcams before travel.
| Skiresort | Precipitation (mm) | Wet days | Temp (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | max/day | ≥ 1 mm | hi | |
| Haukelifjell | 129 | 89 | 2 | 9 |
| Dubrovnik | 106.3 | 74.6 | 2 | 21 |
| Schmallenberg | 66 | 54 | 2 | 11 |
| Pietranera Rovegno | 63 | 63 | 1 | 16 |
| Sankt Martin | 62.8 | 41.9 | 2 | 18 |
| Alta Pusteria | 57.5 | 55.5 | 2 | 9 |
| Altenau | 53 | 45 | 2 | 12 |
| Sankt Andreasberg | 53 | 45 | 2 | 9 |
| Plose | 52 | 41.2 | 2 | 10 |
| Stafal | 51.8 | 44.9 | 2 | 5 |
24hSince yesterday: little change
Strongest visible 5-day precipitation signal: Fjellhaugen at about 194 mm.
multi-day totals reveal persistent wet patterns and help separate one short event from a broader unsettled period.
| Skiresort | Precipitation (mm) | Wet days | Temp (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | max/day | ≥ 1 mm | hi | |
| Fjellhaugen | 194 | 89 | 5 | 12 |
| Roldal | 194 | 89 | 5 | 9 |
| Kvamskogen | 194 | 89 | 5 | 12 |
| Haukelifjell | 179 | 89 | 3 | 9 |
| Eikedalen | 134 | 62 | 4 | 11 |
| Myrkdalen | 114 | 89 | 5 | 5 |
| Dubrovnik | 106.8 | 74.6 | 2 | 21 |
| Schmallenberg | 87 | 54 | 4 | 10 |
| Altenau | 83 | 45 | 4 | 10 |
| Sankt Andreasberg | 83 | 45 | 4 | 8 |
Regional weather, maps and webcams for the next mountain window.
Context for Alpine weather, snow signals and mountain planning.
Choosing a ski resort has always involved compromise. Snow matters, but so do terrain, altitude, lift infrastructure, travel time, resort size, family suitability and the kind of trip you are planning. A destination that is excellent for a week…
Read snow insightReliable ski information does not begin with a model, a map or a ranking. It begins with the people who know the mountain every day: the ski resort teams, lift companies, tourist offices and marketing representatives who see how conditions…
Read snow insightCurrent mountain views, prioritised by relevance and freshness.