Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected9 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

9 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Rohrmoos is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Narrow lead

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Rohrmoos is the strongest alternative. 5 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 3 options have limited evidence coverage.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 20 h ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 142 cm.
AlternativeRohrmoos
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 20 h ago5.0 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceNarrow lead

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Rohrmoos Snow now +3.9 pts and Snow reliability +2.9 pts
Snow now +3.9Snow reliability +2.9Access -1.0Terrain fit -0.8
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeRohrmoos

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce terrain weight from 22 to 1 and Jostsee becomes the leading option.

Lead margin5.0pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier5 options

4 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

TerrainJostsee

Reduce terrain weight from 22 to 1 and Jostsee becomes the leading option.

22 → 1
Family & valueJostsee

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 40 and Jostsee becomes the leading option.

12 → 40
Lift systemRohrmoos

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 56 and Rohrmoos becomes the leading option.

14 → 56
SnowBreuil Cervinia

Increase snow weight from 24 to 98 and Breuil Cervinia becomes the leading option.

24 → 98
Why Chamonix leads Rohrmoos · 5.0 pts
Current opportunity+3.9 pts
Terrain+3.3 pts
Snow+2.9 pts
Lift system-2.2 pts
Scale-1.2 pts
Access-1.0 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29142 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now28.714% weight Decision74.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow142 cm 20.3 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow97 cm 4.6 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 109% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Rohrmoos

#2 · 4 Berge skischaukel · Austria

Decision70/100
Fit70/100
Now0/100
Quality7.4/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4949/100Terrain7575/100Access8272 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit69.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision69.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow49/100 · 73% evidence 11.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain60/100 · 80% evidence 13.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale92/100 · 100% evidence 14.8 / 16.0 pts
Lift system82/100 · 68% evidence 11.4 / 14.0 pts
Access82/100 · 68% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value74/100 · 41% evidence 8.9 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeEfficient short-break baseBest useShort breaks · 72/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area123 km · 1,287 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer72 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 49/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Jostsee

#3 · Goms Oberwald · Switzerland

Decision66/100
Fit66/100
Now0/100
Quality7.1/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6464/100Terrain6767/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit66.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision66.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow64/100 · 37% evidence 17.5 / 27.3 pts
Terrain41/100 · 39% evidence 10.2 / 25.0 pts
Scale69/100 · 85% evidence 12.5 / 18.2 pts
Lift system77/100 · 8% evidence 12.2 / 15.9 pts
Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 34%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useAll-round trips · 66/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area31 km · 825 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 67/100 — led by substantial ski-area scale and strong terrain profile; partial evidence..
  • Good reliability match · 64/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Breuil Cervinia

#4 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision65/100
Fit75/100
Now25/100
Quality9.2/10
Now25100 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now25.022% weight Decision64.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow100 cm 10.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow68 cm 2.3 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 20% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Pitztal

#5 · Piztal · Austria

Decision64/100
Fit78/100
Now8/100
Quality7.8/10
Now840 cm upperReliability9292/100Terrain7171/100Access8254 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit77.581% weight Now7.519% weight Decision64.3/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow92/100 · 73% evidence 22.0 / 24.0 pts
Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 17.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale58/100 · 85% evidence 9.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system80/100 · 8% evidence 11.2 / 14.0 pts
Access82/100 · 68% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value67/100 · 41% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow40 cm 4.4 / 33.3 pts
Open terrain5% 1.1 / 22.2 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 17.8 pts
Valley snow9 cm 0.9 / 17.8 pts
Mid-mountain snow28 cm 1.0 / 8.9 pts
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 90%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 82/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 1,000 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m95%Best transfer54 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 34% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 92/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Scale trails the selected-set median by 11 points.

Saas

#6 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Arnoldstein

#7 · Dreilandereck Arnoldstein · Austria

Decision55/100
Fit55/100
Now0/100
Quality4.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3838/100Terrain6262/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit55.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision55.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 73% evidence 10.3 / 27.3 pts
Terrain65/100 · 80% evidence 16.1 / 25.0 pts
Scale54/100 · 85% evidence 9.8 / 18.2 pts
Lift system58/100 · 68% evidence 9.2 / 15.9 pts
Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 9.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useFamily trips · 58/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area14 km · 872 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 62/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Ochsenkopf

#8 · Ochsenkopf · Germany

Decision49/100
Fit49/100
Now0/100
Quality4.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability2626/100Terrain5858/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit49.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision49.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow26/100 · 37% evidence 7.1 / 27.3 pts
Terrain50/100 · 52% evidence 12.4 / 25.0 pts
Scale29/100 · 100% evidence 5.3 / 18.2 pts
Lift system75/100 · 68% evidence 12.0 / 15.9 pts
Family & value90/100 · 41% evidence 12.3 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 61/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area5 km · 365 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 58/100 — led by strong terrain profile and strong lift-system evidence; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 26/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Breitenberg

#9 · Breitenberg · Germany

Decision45/100
Fit45/100
Now0/100
Quality3.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3434/100Terrain5050/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit45.2100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision45.2/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow34/100 · 37% evidence 9.2 / 27.3 pts
Terrain47/100 · 39% evidence 11.6 / 25.0 pts
Scale51/100 · 100% evidence 9.2 / 18.2 pts
Lift system75/100 · 68% evidence 11.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value24/100 · 31% evidence 3.2 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 47%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLifts-led destinationBest useShort breaks · 48/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area7 km · 875 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 34/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyRohrmoos4 Berge skischaukelJostseeGoms OberwaldBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadisePitztalPiztalSaasSaastalArnoldsteinDreilandereck ArnoldsteinOchsenkopfOchsenkopfBreitenbergBreitenberg
Assessment
Decision score 75/100clear advantage70/10066/10065/10064/10064/10055/10049/10045/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage70/10066/10075/10078/10064/10055/10049/10045/100
Current opportunity 29/1000/1000/10025/1008/1000/1000/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/107.4/107.1/109.2/10clear advantage7.8/108.7/104.5/104.5/103.0/10
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumLowMediumMediumMediumMediumLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10073/10065/10076/10087/100clear advantage78/10046/10037/10020/100
Typical daytime high 3°C2°C0°C-2°C1°C1°C4°C1°C4°C
Typical snow/freezing level –––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-5°C-7°C-7°C-5°C-6°C-4°C-4°C-3°C
Rating 8.1/106.8/10–8.1/107.2/107.4/105.8/106.9/105.6/10
Area size class 150–250 km100–150 km20–50 km250+ km20 km or less100–150 km20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less
Ability profile advancedadvancednoviceadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvanced
Price class highlowhighhighavghighavgavgavg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km123 km31 km322 kmclear advantage15 km142 km14 km5 km7 km
Lowest point 1,000 m728 m1,255 m1,562 m1,450 m1,472 m680 m659 m800 m
Highest point 3,842 m2,015 m2,080 m3,899 m2,450 m3,573 m1,552 m1,024 m1,675 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,287 m825 m2,337 m1,000 m2,101 m872 m365 m875 m
Blue pistes 34%38%100%23%26%22%35%51%0%
Red pistes 44%56%0%68%58%62%53%49%100%
Black pistes 22%clear advantage7%0%8%16%16%12%0%0%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%0%–92%95%57%0%––
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%0%–21%40%clear advantage0%0%––
Piste-mix diversity 97/10080/100–74/10088/10084/10087/100100/100–
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage25/100–51/10067/10068/10062/100––
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage1%–6%10%2%3%––
Historical context
Historical snow resilience –––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Snow consistency –––––––––
Late-winter retention –––––––––
Lower-mountain retention –––––––––
Warm-winter resilience –––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+109% vs average · 92th percentile––Below typical-20% vs average · 23th percentileBelow typical-34% vs average · 23th percentile––––
Valley snow versus typical –––Below typical-41% vs average · 57th percentileClose to typical-46% vs average · 53th percentile––––
Open slopes versus typical –––Close to typical-21% vs average · 45th percentileWell below typical-81% vs average · 0th percentile––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm––19 cm9 cm––––
Mid-mountain snow 97 cmclear advantage––68 cm28 cm––––
Mountain snow 142 cmclear advantage––100 cm40 cm––––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality –––9.6/10–––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –––7%5%––––
Open lifts –––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km689 pph/km–298 pph/km–289 pph/km556 pph/km766 pph/km736 pph/km
Lift-system coverage 0.48×0.44×–0.28×–0.28×0.37×0.94×clear advantage0.73×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift2.6 km/lift2.6 km/lift6.3 km/lift1.2 km/lift3.6 km/lift1.9 km/lift1.2 km/lift1.4 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 2°C2°C-7°C-8°C0°C-2°C6°C5°C8°C
Maximum temperature 9°C8°C3°C-5°C8°C6°C12°C10°C12°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability –family–––family–––
Piste variety slopes––slopes–slopes–––
Off-piste offpiste––offpiste–––––
Cross-country –crosscountry–––––––
Lift network –lifts–lifts–lifts–––
Mountain restaurants –––restaurants–restaurants–––
Après-ski –apresski–apresski–apresski–––
Public transport transittransit–transittransit––––
Best airport transfer 63 min72 min–104 min54 min441 min–––
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer103 km/h transfer–186 km/h transfer17 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer–––