Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected10 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

10 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Valtournenche is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 5 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Recommended

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Valtournenche is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 5 options have limited evidence coverage.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 22 h ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 142 cm.
AlternativeValtournenche
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 22 h ago8.3 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Valtournenche Terrain fit +8.0 pts and Snow now +3.4 pts
Terrain fit +8.0Snow reliability -4.8Snow now +3.4Access +1.8
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeValtournenche

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIncrease snow weight from 24 to 75 and Valtournenche becomes the leading option.

Lead margin8.3pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier2 options

5 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowValtournenche

Increase snow weight from 24 to 75 and Valtournenche becomes the leading option.

24 → 75
Why Chamonix leads Valtournenche · 8.3 pts
Snow-4.8 pts
Lift system+4.4 pts
Current opportunity+3.4 pts
Terrain+2.2 pts
Access+1.8 pts
Family & value+1.6 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Shared ski-area data: Valtournenche, Breuil Cervinia share Matterhorn Ski Paradise. Permanent profile values are identical; current local observations may differ.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29142 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now28.714% weight Decision74.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow142 cm 20.3 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow97 cm 4.6 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 109% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Valtournenche

#2 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision66/100
Fit76/100
Now4/100
Quality9.2/10
Now415 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access6891 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit76.286% weight Now4.014% weight Decision66.4/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access68/100 · 68% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow15 cm 2.1 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow10 cm 1.3 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow13 cm 0.6 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer91 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 71% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#3 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision65/100
Fit75/100
Now25/100
Quality9.2/10
Now25100 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now25.022% weight Decision64.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow100 cm 10.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow68 cm 2.3 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 20% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#4 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Rottach Egern

#5 · Rottach Egern · Germany

Decision43/100
Fit43/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4040/100Terrain4545/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit43.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision43.4/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow40/100 · 73% evidence 10.9 / 27.3 pts
Terrain58/100 · 67% evidence 14.4 / 25.0 pts
Scale27/100 · 85% evidence 4.9 / 18.2 pts
Lift system64/100 · 68% evidence 10.1 / 15.9 pts
Family & value23/100 · 31% evidence 3.1 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 47/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area1 km · 836 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Current dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 45/100 — led by strong terrain profile and strong lift-system evidence; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 40/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Hesselberg

#6 · Hesselberg · Germany

Decision28/100
Fit28/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability66/100Terrain3636/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit27.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision27.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow6/100 · 37% evidence 1.5 / 27.3 pts
Terrain1/100 · 31% evidence 0.3 / 25.0 pts
Scale8/100 · 100% evidence 1.5 / 18.2 pts
Lift system81/100 · 68% evidence 12.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value83/100 · 31% evidence 11.3 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 45%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 47/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area0 km · 50 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 36/100 — led by strong lift-system evidence and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 6/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Dollach

#7 · Dollach · Austria

Decision27/100
Fit27/100
Now–/100
Quality–/10
Reliability3838/100Terrain2323/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit26.7100% weight Now–0% weight Decision26.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 37% evidence 10.2 / 27.3 pts
Terrain3/100 · 31% evidence 0.7 / 25.0 pts
Scale8/100 · 85% evidence 1.5 / 18.2 pts
Lift system4/100 · 8% evidence 0.7 / 15.9 pts
Family & value100/100 · 18% evidence 13.6 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 33%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useSnow-first trips · 31/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area1 km · 85 m verticalCurrent dataNo current updatePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 23/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Greifensee

#8 · Greifensee · Switzerland

Decision25/100
Fit25/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3434/100Terrain2222/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit25.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision25.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow34/100 · 36% evidence 9.2 / 27.3 pts
Terrain0/100 · 15% evidence 0.0 / 25.0 pts
Scale61/100 · 58% evidence 11.1 / 18.2 pts
Lift system31/100 · 8% evidence 4.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value0/100 · 18% evidence 0.0 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 25%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeScale-led destinationSnow reliabilityVery highSki area22 km · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 22/100 — led by substantial ski-area scale and strong terrain profile; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 34/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Ferndorf

#9 · · Austria

Decision–/100
Fit–/100
Now–/100
Quality–/10
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded
Family & valueNo data excluded
Lift systemNo data excluded
ScaleNo data excluded
SnowNo data excluded
TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date
Strengths
  • The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Blumenstein

#10 · · Switzerland

Decision–/100
Fit–/100
Now–/100
Quality–/10
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

AccessNo data excluded
Family & valueNo data excluded
Lift systemNo data excluded
ScaleNo data excluded
SnowNo data excluded
TerrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snowNo data excluded
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 0%

Destination typeEvidence-limited destinationSnow reliabilityNot availableSki area– · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected date
Strengths
  • The destination remains scoreable, but there is not enough evidence for a strong archetype.
Consider

Some enriched evidence is unavailable; it is excluded from the score rather than treated as zero.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyValtournencheMatterhorn Ski ParadiseBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalRottach EgernRottach EgernHesselbergHesselbergDollachDollachGreifenseeGreifenseeFerndorfAustriaBlumensteinSwitzerland
Assessment
Decision score 75/100clear advantage66/10065/10064/10043/10028/10027/10025/100––
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage76/10075/10064/10043/10028/10027/10025/100––
Current opportunity 29/1004/10025/1000/1000/1000/100–0/100––
Overall quality 6.0/109.2/10Shared ski-area value8.7/104.0/10–––––
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumLowLowLowLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10076/100Shared ski-area value78/10051/1008/10055/10075/100––
Typical daytime high 3°C-2°CShared ski-area value1°C3°C5°C5°C4°C––
Typical snow/freezing level ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-7°CShared ski-area value-6°C-4°C-2°C-2°C-3°C––
Rating 8.1/108.1/10Shared ski-area value7.4/105.4/106.0/10––––
Area size class 150–250 km250+ kmShared ski-area value100–150 km20 km or less20 km or less20 km or less20–50 km––
Ability profile advancedadvancedShared ski-area valueadvancedexpertnovicenovice–––
Price class highhighShared ski-area valuehighavglow–avg––
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km322 kmShared ski-area value142 km1 km0 km1 km22 km––
Lowest point 1,000 m1,562 mShared ski-area value1,472 m784 m560 m1,060 m–––
Highest point 3,842 m3,899 mShared ski-area value3,573 m1,620 m610 m1,145 m435 m––
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage2,337 mShared ski-area value2,101 m836 m50 m85 m–––
Blue pistes 34%23%Shared ski-area value22%0%100%100%0%––
Red pistes 44%68%Shared ski-area value62%0%0%0%0%––
Black pistes 22%8%Shared ski-area value16%100%clear advantage0%0%0%––
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%92%Shared ski-area value57%0%–––––
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%21%Shared ski-area value0%0%–––––
Piste-mix diversity 97/100clear advantage74/100Shared ski-area value84/100––––––
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage51/100Shared ski-area value68/10073/100–––––
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage6%Shared ski-area value2%1%–––––
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Snow consistency ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Late-winter retention ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+109% vs average · 92th percentileWell below typical-71% vs average · 0th percentileBelow typical-20% vs average · 23th percentile–––––––
Valley snow versus typical –Well below typical-67% vs average · 3th percentileBelow typical-41% vs average · 57th percentile–––––––
Open slopes versus typical ––Close to typical-21% vs average · 45th percentile–––––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm10 cm19 cm–––––––
Mid-mountain snow 97 cmclear advantage13 cm68 cm–––––––
Mountain snow 142 cmclear advantage15 cm100 cm–––––––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm–0 cm––
Snow quality ––9.6/10–––––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm–0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes ––7%–––––––
Open lifts ––––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km298 pph/kmShared ski-area value289 pph/km550 pph/km1,500 pph/kmclear advantage––––
Lift-system coverage 0.48×0.28×Shared ski-area value0.28×2.10×clear advantage0.75×––––
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift6.3 km/liftShared ski-area value3.6 km/lift1.0 km/lift0.4 km/lift1.0 km/lift5.5 km/lift––
Weather
Minimum temperature 3°C3°C-7°C-1°C3°C1°C–5°C5°C3°C
Maximum temperature 11°C10°C-5°C8°C9°C9°C–10°C13°C10°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability ––Shared ski-area valuefamily––––––
Piste variety slopesslopesShared ski-area valueslopes––––––
Off-piste offpisteoffpisteShared ski-area value–––––––
Cross-country ––Shared ski-area value–––––––
Lift network –liftsShared ski-area valuelifts––––––
Mountain restaurants –restaurantsShared ski-area valuerestaurants––––––
Après-ski –apresskiShared ski-area valueapresski––––––
Public transport transittransitShared ski-area value–––––––
Best airport transfer 63 minclear advantage91 min104 min441 min––––––
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer212 km/h transferclear advantage186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer––––––