Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected10 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

10 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Belalp is the strongest alternative. 7 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Effectively tied

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix narrowly leads because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Belalp is the strongest alternative. 7 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeBelalp
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Belalp is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago2.9 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choiceEffectively tied

Effectively tied with Belalp. strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.

Why Chamonix leads Belalp Access +5.0 pts and Snow now +4.0 pts
Snow reliability -6.6Access +5.0Snow now +4.0Terrain fit +0.6
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBelalp

Main uncertaintyThe lead over Belalp is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultReduce access weight from 12 to 5 and Belalp becomes the leading option.

Lead margin2.9pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier7 options

3 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

AccessBelalp

Reduce access weight from 12 to 5 and Belalp becomes the leading option.

12 → 5
Lift systemBelalp

Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 4 and Belalp becomes the leading option.

14 → 4
SnowBelalp

Increase snow weight from 24 to 37 and Belalp becomes the leading option.

24 → 37
Family & valueBelalp

Increase family & value weight from 12 to 45 and Belalp becomes the leading option.

12 → 45
Why Chamonix leads Belalp · 2.9 pts
Snow-6.6 pts
Access+5.0 pts
Current opportunity+4.0 pts
Lift system+3.9 pts
Terrain-1.8 pts
Family & value-1.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Belalp

#2 · Belalp Blatten Naters · Switzerland

Decision72/100
Fit72/100
Now0/100
Quality8.4/10
Now00 cm freshReliability8888/100Terrain7373/100Access31149 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit71.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision71.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow88/100 · 73% evidence 21.2 / 24.0 pts
Terrain83/100 · 80% evidence 18.2 / 22.0 pts
Scale85/100 · 100% evidence 13.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access31/100 · 68% evidence 3.8 / 12.0 pts
Family & value81/100 · 41% evidence 9.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useSnow-first trips · 78/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area38 km · 1,796 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m77%Best transfer149 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 73/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 88/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Chamrousse

#3 · Chamrousse · France

Decision67/100
Fit67/100
Now0/100
Quality9.2/10
Now00 cm freshReliability6262/100Terrain6363/100Access9844 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit66.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision66.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow62/100 · 73% evidence 14.8 / 24.0 pts
Terrain72/100 · 80% evidence 15.9 / 22.0 pts
Scale76/100 · 100% evidence 12.2 / 16.0 pts
Lift system26/100 · 68% evidence 3.6 / 14.0 pts
Access98/100 · 68% evidence 11.7 / 12.0 pts
Family & value69/100 · 41% evidence 8.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useShort breaks · 67/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area90 km · 850 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m27%Best transfer44 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 63/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Solid reliability match · 62/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#4 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now22/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.022% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#5 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Saint Francois Longchamps

#6 · Le Grand Domaine · France

Decision62/100
Fit69/100
Now27/100
Quality8.4/10
Now27150 cm upperReliability6464/100Terrain7070/100Access7576 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit69.184% weight Now27.116% weight Decision62.3/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow64/100 · 73% evidence 15.4 / 24.0 pts
Terrain64/100 · 80% evidence 14.2 / 22.0 pts
Scale93/100 · 100% evidence 14.8 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access75/100 · 68% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow150 cm 18.8 / 37.5 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 20.0 pts
Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 20.0 pts
Snow quality3.7/10 4.6 / 12.5 pts
Mid-mountain snow90 cm 3.8 / 10.0 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded

Data coverage: 80%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useFamily trips · 71/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area165 km · 1,153 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m27%Best transfer76 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 73% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 64/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Molltaler Gletscher

#7 · Molltaler Gletscher · Austria

Decision62/100
Fit71/100
Now3/100
Quality7.5/10
Now315 cm upperReliability9090/100Terrain6969/100Access46124 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit71.186% weight Now2.614% weight Decision61.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow90/100 · 37% evidence 21.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain84/100 · 52% evidence 18.5 / 22.0 pts
Scale79/100 · 100% evidence 12.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system41/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 14.0 pts
Access46/100 · 68% evidence 5.5 / 12.0 pts
Family & value60/100 · 41% evidence 7.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow15 cm 2.1 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow9 cm 0.4 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useSnow-first trips · 77/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area36 km · 1,014 m verticalBest transfer124 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 69% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 69/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 90/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Aschau im Chiemgau

#8 · Region Chiemgau · Germany

Decision61/100
Fit61/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3939/100Terrain6363/100Access9247 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit60.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision60.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow39/100 · 73% evidence 9.4 / 24.0 pts
Terrain60/100 · 80% evidence 13.2 / 22.0 pts
Scale81/100 · 85% evidence 12.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system37/100 · 8% evidence 5.1 / 14.0 pts
Access92/100 · 68% evidence 11.0 / 12.0 pts
Family & value76/100 · 41% evidence 9.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useFamily trips · 64/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area51 km · 990 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer47 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 63/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 39/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Campione

#9 · Campione · Italy

Decision60/100
Fit60/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4545/100Terrain6666/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit60.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision60.4/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow45/100 · 36% evidence 12.3 / 27.3 pts
Terrain72/100 · 28% evidence 18.1 / 25.0 pts
Scale70/100 · 58% evidence 12.7 / 18.2 pts
Lift system71/100 · 8% evidence 11.3 / 15.9 pts
Family & value44/100 · 28% evidence 6.0 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 29%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 65/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area30 km · – verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 66/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 45/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Alleghe Civetta

#10 · Civetta · Italy

Decision59/100
Fit60/100
Now58/100
Quality7.3/10
Now58185 cm upperReliability5454/100Terrain7070/100Access18169 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit59.686% weight Now58.114% weight Decision59.4/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow54/100 · 73% evidence 13.0 / 24.0 pts
Terrain67/100 · 80% evidence 14.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale79/100 · 100% evidence 12.6 / 16.0 pts
Lift system57/100 · 68% evidence 7.9 / 14.0 pts
Access18/100 · 68% evidence 2.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 9.0 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow185 cm 26.4 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow200 cm 22.9 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow185 cm 8.8 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 64/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area72 km · 1,100 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m2%Best transfer169 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 37% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Solid reliability match · 54/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyBelalpBelalp Blatten NatersChamrousseChamrousseBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalSaint Francois LongchampsLe Grand DomaineMolltaler GletscherMolltaler GletscherAschau im ChiemgauRegion ChiemgauCampioneCampioneAlleghe CivettaCivetta
Assessment
Decision score 75/10072/10067/10064/10064/10062/10062/10061/10060/10059/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage72/10067/10075/10064/10069/10071/10061/10060/10060/100
Current opportunity 29/1000/1000/10022/1000/10027/1003/1000/1000/10058/100clear advantage
Overall quality 6.0/108.4/109.2/109.2/108.7/108.4/107.5/104.0/10–7.3/10
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumLowMedium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10070/10073/10076/10078/10077/10081/10050/10025/10067/100
Typical daytime high 3°C0°C0°C-2°Cclear advantage1°C2°C0°C5°C7°C1°C
Typical snow/freezing level ––––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-7°C-7°C-7°C-6°C-5°C-5°C-3°C-1°C-7°C
Rating 8.1/107.0/107.0/108.1/107.4/107.4/106.8/106.0/10–6.3/10
Area size class 150–250 km20–50 km50–100 km250+ km100–150 km150–250 km20–50 km50–100 km20–50 km50–100 km
Ability profile advancedexpertadvancedadvancedadvancednoviceexpertadvancedadvancedadvanced
Price class highhighlowhighhighavgavgavg–avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km38 km90 km322 kmclear advantage142 km165 km36 km51 km30 km72 km
Lowest point 1,000 m1,322 m1,400 m1,562 m1,472 m1,250 m2,108 mclear advantage610 m–1,000 m
Highest point 3,842 m3,118 m2,250 m3,899 m3,573 m2,403 m3,122 m1,600 m2,000 m2,100 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,796 m850 m2,337 m2,101 m1,153 m1,014 m990 m–1,100 m
Blue pistes 34%40%28%23%22%70%18%40%13%39%
Red pistes 44%32%50%68%62%21%56%47%70%50%
Black pistes 22%29%22%8%16%9%26%13%17%11%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%77%27%92%clear advantage57%27%–0%–2%
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%3%0%21%clear advantage0%0%–0%–0%
Piste-mix diversity 97/10099/10094/10074/10084/10073/10090/10090/10074/10087/100
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage50/10039/10051/10068/10044/100–34/100–37/100
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage6%4%6%2%4%–1%–3%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience ––––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth ––––––––––
Snow consistency ––––––––––
Late-winter retention ––––––––––
Lower-mountain retention ––––––––––
Warm-winter resilience ––––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentile––Well below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile–Well above typical+73% vs average · 100th percentileWell below typical-69% vs average · 11th percentile––Well above typical+37% vs average · 100th percentile
Valley snow versus typical –––Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile–Close to typical-100% vs average · 0th percentileClose to typical-100% vs average · 0th percentile––Well above typical+328% vs average · 100th percentile
Open slopes versus typical –––Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile––––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm––19 cm–0 cm0 cm––200 cmclear advantage
Mid-mountain snow 99 cm––53 cm–90 cm9 cm––185 cmclear advantage
Mountain snow 145 cm––75 cm–150 cm15 cm––185 cmclear advantage
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality –––9.6/10clear advantage–3.7/10––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –––7%––––––
Open lifts ––––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/kmclear advantage366 pph/km309 pph/km298 pph/km289 pph/km344 pph/km394 pph/km––483 pph/km
Lift-system coverage 0.48×clear advantage0.28×0.17×0.28×0.28×0.26×0.30×––0.28×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift2.9 km/lift5.6 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift3.5 km/lift4.5 km/lift7.3 km/lift3.0 km/lift3.1 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 4°C0°C4°C1°C1°C1°C-11°C6°C7°C4°C
Maximum temperature 11°C6°C10°C9°C6°C10°C-4°C11°C18°C14°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability ––family–familyfamily––––
Piste variety slopes–slopesslopesslopesslopes––––
Off-piste offpiste––offpiste––––––
Cross-country ––––––––––
Lift network –––liftslifts–lifts–––
Mountain restaurants –––restaurantsrestaurants–––––
Après-ski –––apresskiapresski–––––
Public transport transit–transittransit–transit–transit––
Best airport transfer 63 min149 min44 min104 min441 min76 min124 min47 min–169 min
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer15 km/h transfer123 km/h transfer186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer130 km/h transfer17 km/h transfer65 km/h transfer–26 km/h transfer