Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected9 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

9 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Breuil Cervinia is the strongest alternative. 3 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Recommended

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Breuil Cervinia is the strongest alternative. 3 options remain on the Pareto frontier.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 145 cm.

Supporting data are stale; treat the ranking as provisional.

AlternativeBreuil Cervinia
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.
Stale evidenceUpdated 1 d ago10.9 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Breuil Cervinia Terrain fit +11.8 pts and Access +3.1 pts
Terrain fit +11.8Access +3.1Snow reliability -3.0Snow now -0.8
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBreuil Cervinia

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIncrease lift system weight from 14 to 62 and Les Rousses becomes the leading option.

Lead margin10.9pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier3 options

6 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

Lift systemLes Rousses

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 62 and Les Rousses becomes the leading option.

14 → 62
Why Chamonix leads Breuil Cervinia · 10.9 pts
Lift system+4.9 pts
Terrain+3.6 pts
Access+3.1 pts
Snow-3.0 pts
Family & value+2.2 pts
Scale+1.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29145 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now29.214% weight Decision74.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow145 cm 20.7 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow99 cm 4.7 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 133% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Breuil Cervinia

#2 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit75/100
Now22/100
Quality9.2/10
Now2275 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now22.022% weight Decision63.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow75 cm 7.5 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 40% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#3 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Les Rousses

#4 · Les Rousses · France

Decision63/100
Fit63/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4141/100Terrain6767/100Access8856 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit62.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision62.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow41/100 · 73% evidence 9.8 / 24.0 pts
Terrain41/100 · 80% evidence 9.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale67/100 · 85% evidence 10.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system95/100 · 8% evidence 13.3 / 14.0 pts
Access88/100 · 68% evidence 10.6 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeEfficient short-break baseBest useShort breaks · 72/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area39 km · 560 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer56 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 67/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 41/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Reutte

#5 · Reutte Hahnenkamm · Austria

Decision60/100
Fit60/100
Now0/100
Quality5.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5858/100Terrain5656/100Access8353 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit59.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision59.9/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow58/100 · 37% evidence 13.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain71/100 · 52% evidence 15.5 / 22.0 pts
Scale57/100 · 100% evidence 9.1 / 16.0 pts
Lift system25/100 · 68% evidence 3.5 / 14.0 pts
Access83/100 · 68% evidence 10.0 / 12.0 pts
Family & value66/100 · 41% evidence 7.9 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useAdvanced skiing · 61/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area16 km · 1,046 m verticalBest transfer53 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 56/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 58/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Engelberg

#6 · Engelberg · Switzerland

Decision60/100
Fit70/100
Now22/100
Quality6.0/10
Now2289 cm upperReliability6464/100Terrain7373/100Access6789 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit70.278% weight Now21.722% weight Decision59.8/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow64/100 · 73% evidence 15.4 / 24.0 pts
Terrain72/100 · 80% evidence 15.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale93/100 · 85% evidence 14.8 / 16.0 pts
Lift system57/100 · 68% evidence 7.9 / 14.0 pts
Access67/100 · 68% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value68/100 · 41% evidence 8.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow89 cm 8.9 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow53 cm 1.8 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 72/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area79 km · 2,017 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m4%Best transfer89 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 12% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 73/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 64/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Across the commonly available decision dimensions, Chamonix Valley is at least as strong and meaningfully better on one or more dimensions.

Giswil

#7 · Giswil Morlialp · Switzerland

Decision57/100
Fit57/100
Now0/100
Quality5.8/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5151/100Terrain5757/100Access7660 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit57.4100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision57.4/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow51/100 · 37% evidence 12.2 / 24.0 pts
Terrain63/100 · 52% evidence 13.9 / 22.0 pts
Scale43/100 · 100% evidence 6.8 / 16.0 pts
Lift system57/100 · 68% evidence 8.0 / 14.0 pts
Access76/100 · 68% evidence 9.1 / 12.0 pts
Family & value62/100 · 41% evidence 7.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAccess-led destinationBest useShort breaks · 61/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area12 km · 482 m verticalBest transfer60 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 57/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 51/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

The ski area is comparatively compact.

Ravascletto

#8 · Ravascletto Zoncolan · Italy

Decision56/100
Fit56/100
Now0/100
Quality6.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4444/100Terrain7070/100Access8195 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision56.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow44/100 · 73% evidence 10.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain73/100 · 80% evidence 16.1 / 22.0 pts
Scale64/100 · 100% evidence 10.2 / 16.0 pts
Lift system65/100 · 68% evidence 9.0 / 14.0 pts
Access8/100 · 68% evidence 0.9 / 12.0 pts
Family & value76/100 · 41% evidence 9.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 62/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area24 km · 1,070 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer195 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Mixed reliability match · 44/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Obsteig

#9 · Grunberg Obsteig · Austria

Decision41/100
Fit41/100
Now0/100
Quality4.0/10
Now00 cm freshReliability3838/100Terrain4545/100Access21141 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit40.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision40.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow38/100 · 73% evidence 9.0 / 24.0 pts
Terrain26/100 · 80% evidence 5.7 / 22.0 pts
Scale15/100 · 100% evidence 2.4 / 16.0 pts
Lift system84/100 · 68% evidence 11.8 / 14.0 pts
Access21/100 · 68% evidence 2.5 / 12.0 pts
Family & value77/100 · 41% evidence 9.2 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLift-system performerBest useFamily trips · 51/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area1 km · 72 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer141 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 45/100 — led by strong terrain profile and strong lift-system evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 38/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Terrain depth is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseSaasSaastalLes RoussesLes RoussesReutteReutte HahnenkammEngelbergEngelbergGiswilGiswil MorlialpRavasclettoRavascletto ZoncolanObsteigGrunberg Obsteig
Assessment
Decision score 75/100clear advantage64/10064/10063/10060/10060/10057/10056/10041/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage75/10064/10063/10060/10070/10057/10056/10041/100
Current opportunity 29/100clear advantage22/1000/1000/1000/10022/1000/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/109.2/10clear advantage8.7/104.0/105.0/106.0/105.8/106.0/104.0/10
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMediumMedium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10076/10078/10048/10064/10078/10045/10047/10065/100
Typical daytime high 3°C-2°C1°C3°C3°C-2°C3°C3°C3°C
Typical snow/freezing level –––––––––
Typical overnight low -4°C-7°C-6°C-3°C-3°C-8°C-3°C-6°C-4°C
Rating 8.1/108.1/107.4/106.6/105.4/107.2/106.6/106.4/104.4/10
Area size class 150–250 km250+ km100–150 km20–50 km20 km or less50–100 km20 km or less20–50 km20 km or less
Ability profile advancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancednovice
Price class highhighhighlowlowhighhighavgavg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km322 kmclear advantage142 km39 km16 km79 km12 km24 km1 km
Lowest point 1,000 m1,562 m1,472 m1,120 m854 m1,003 m1,355 m900 m1,030 m
Highest point 3,842 m3,899 m3,573 m1,680 m1,900 m3,020 m1,837 m1,970 m1,102 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage2,337 m2,101 m560 m1,046 m2,017 m482 m1,070 m72 m
Blue pistes 34%23%22%44%31%28%23%37%77%
Red pistes 44%68%62%50%56%58%60%46%23%
Black pistes 22%clear advantage8%16%6%13%15%17%17%0%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%92%clear advantage57%0%–4%–0%0%
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%21%clear advantage0%0%–0%–0%0%
Piste-mix diversity 97/10074/10084/10080/10086/10087/10086/10093/10078/100
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage51/10068/10023/100–55/100–66/1008/100
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage6%2%0%–3%–4%0%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience –––––––––
Typical early-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Typical core-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Typical late-winter mountain depth –––––––––
Snow consistency –––––––––
Late-winter retention –––––––––
Lower-mountain retention –––––––––
Warm-winter resilience –––––––––
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+133% vs average · 100th percentileWell below typical-40% vs average · 4th percentile–––Above typical-12% vs average · 67th percentile–––
Valley snow versus typical –Below typical-40% vs average · 58th percentile–––Close to typical0th percentile–––
Open slopes versus typical –Close to typical-21% vs average · 46th percentile–––Close to typical+2% vs average · 92th percentile–––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm19 cm–––0 cm–––
Mid-mountain snow 99 cmclear advantage53 cm–––53 cm–––
Mountain snow 145 cmclear advantage75 cm–––89 cm–––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality –9.6/10–––9.6/10–––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes –7%–––7%–––
Open lifts –––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km298 pph/km289 pph/km–325 pph/km428 pph/km698 pph/km676 pph/km5,308 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage 0.48×0.28×0.28×–0.23×0.33×0.27×0.36×0.46×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift1.2 km/lift4.0 km/lift2.8 km/lift1.5 km/lift2.2 km/lift0.3 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 4°C1°C1°C3°C3°C1°C8°C4°C2°C
Maximum temperature 11°C9°C6°C7°C9°C6°C14°C9°C11°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability ––family––––family–
Piste variety slopesslopesslopes––––––
Off-piste offpisteoffpiste–––offpiste–––
Cross-country –––––––––
Lift network –liftslifts––lifts–––
Mountain restaurants –restaurantsrestaurants––––––
Après-ski –apresskiapresski––––––
Public transport transittransit–transittransittransittransit––
Best airport transfer 63 min104 min441 min56 min53 min89 min60 min195 min141 min
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer186 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer42 km/h transfer18 km/h transfer53 km/h transfer12 km/h transfer7 km/h transfer1 km/h transfer