Skip to main content
Where to ski

Compare ski resorts

Compare long-term ski-area quality, current conditions and short-term seven-day skiing scenarios without mixing their evidence.

Selected9 of 10
ProfileBalanced
ModeStructural
Comparison workspace

Shape the comparison

Set the comparison priorities, then inspect which selected resort fits best and what could change the result.

9 of 10 selected
Export
Add resorts

Balances permanent quality, snow reliability, terrain and current conditions.

Tune prioritiesBalanced
Decision weights

Missing resort data remain eligible: unavailable evidence is omitted and confidence falls instead of the resort receiving a zero.

More comparison optionsTrip context · direct add · display
Fit = structural suitabilityNow = current opportunityDecision combines both when timing makes current conditions relevant
How Benchmark works

Priorities determine the structural ranking; optional trip context refines those priorities without excluding a resort. Evidence describes data support, Stability tests nearby priority changes, and Frontier marks a non-dominated option on comparable evidence.

Trip contextOptional

Use these only when they matter for this trip. They adjust ranking and interpretation; they are not hidden filters.

Travel origin is preserved with the decision state; access scoring uses the selected arrival hub when one is chosen.
Display options
Comparison sections
Decision horizon
Recommendation

Decision summary

Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Grimentz is the strongest alternative. 6 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.

Balanced profileSummer / glacier
Recommended

Chamonix

75/100
Why
  1. Chamonix is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Grimentz is the strongest alternative. 6 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 4 options have limited evidence coverage.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 20 h ago
  • Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (82/100).
  • Solid upper-mountain snow base at 142 cm.
AlternativeGrimentz
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.
Mixed evidenceUpdated 20 h ago8.1 pts lead
Next
Open webcamsShow on mapInspect forecast
Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries
Recommended for this profile

Chamonix

Advanced-terrain specialistLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Chamonix leads Grimentz Snow now +3.9 pts and Terrain fit +3.7 pts
Snow now +3.9Terrain fit +3.7Access +3.4Snow reliability -2.9
Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeGrimentz

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIncrease snow weight from 24 to 98 and Breuil Cervinia becomes the leading option.

Lead margin8.1pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence73%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
Pareto frontier6 options

3 options are dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowBreuil Cervinia

Increase snow weight from 24 to 98 and Breuil Cervinia becomes the leading option.

24 → 98
Why Chamonix leads Grimentz · 8.1 pts
Lift system+6.5 pts
Current opportunity+3.9 pts
Access+3.4 pts
Terrain-3.0 pts
Snow-2.9 pts
Scale+0.1 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Shared ski-area data: Altastenberg, Neuastenberg share Winterberg. Permanent profile values are identical; current local observations may differ.

Chamonix

#1 · Chamonix Valley · France

Decision75/100
Fit82/100
Now29/100
Quality6.0/10
Now29142 cm upperReliability7171/100Terrain8686/100Access8563 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit81.986% weight Now28.714% weight Decision74.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow71/100 · 73% evidence 16.9 / 24.0 pts
Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 19.0 / 22.0 pts
Scale98/100 · 85% evidence 15.7 / 16.0 pts
Lift system76/100 · 68% evidence 10.7 / 14.0 pts
Access85/100 · 68% evidence 10.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value79/100 · 41% evidence 9.5 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow142 cm 20.3 / 42.9 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts
Valley snow30 cm 3.8 / 22.9 pts
Mid-mountain snow97 cm 4.6 / 11.4 pts
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 84/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area175 km · 2,842 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer63 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 109% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 71/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Grimentz

#2 · Grimentz Zinal · Switzerland

Decision67/100
Fit67/100
Now0/100
Quality9.1/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7373/100Terrain6868/100Access45132 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit66.6100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision66.6/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow73/100 · 73% evidence 17.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain88/100 · 80% evidence 19.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale84/100 · 100% evidence 13.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system19/100 · 68% evidence 2.7 / 14.0 pts
Access45/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 12.0 pts
Family & value68/100 · 41% evidence 8.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeAdvanced-terrain specialistBest useAdvanced skiing · 74/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area115 km · 1,330 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m82%Best transfer132 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 73/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Breuil Cervinia

#3 · Matterhorn Ski Paradise · Italy

Decision65/100
Fit75/100
Now25/100
Quality9.2/10
Now25100 cm upperReliability9494/100Terrain7171/100Access61104 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit75.478% weight Now25.022% weight Decision64.5/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow94/100 · 73% evidence 22.5 / 24.0 pts
Terrain75/100 · 80% evidence 16.4 / 22.0 pts
Scale99/100 · 100% evidence 15.9 / 16.0 pts
Lift system40/100 · 68% evidence 5.6 / 14.0 pts
Access61/100 · 68% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value64/100 · 41% evidence 7.7 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow100 cm 10.0 / 30.0 pts
Open terrain7% 1.4 / 20.0 pts
Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 16.0 pts
Valley snow19 cm 1.7 / 16.0 pts
Snow quality9.6/10 9.6 / 10.0 pts
Mid-mountain snow68 cm 2.3 / 8.0 pts

Data coverage: 100%

Destination typeHigh-alpine snow anchorBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area322 km · 2,337 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m92%Best transfer104 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group300+ km · Top 2,800+ mCalendar contextMountain snow is 20% below the available five-year level for this point in the season.
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 71/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Exceptional reliability match · 94/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Brusson

#4 · Monte Rosa Ski · Italy

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality7.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5656/100Terrain6565/100Access7880 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit64.2100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision64.2/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow56/100 · 73% evidence 13.4 / 24.0 pts
Terrain67/100 · 80% evidence 14.8 / 22.0 pts
Scale96/100 · 100% evidence 15.3 / 16.0 pts
Lift system30/100 · 68% evidence 4.2 / 14.0 pts
Access78/100 · 68% evidence 9.3 / 12.0 pts
Family & value61/100 · 41% evidence 7.3 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 66/100Snow reliabilityModerateSki area132 km · 2,063 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m0%Best transfer80 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 65/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Saas

#5 · Saastal · Switzerland

Decision64/100
Fit64/100
Now0/100
Quality8.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability7474/100Terrain7070/100Access10441 min
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit63.7100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision63.7/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow74/100 · 73% evidence 17.7 / 24.0 pts
Terrain74/100 · 80% evidence 16.3 / 22.0 pts
Scale97/100 · 85% evidence 15.5 / 16.0 pts
Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts
Access10/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 12.0 pts
Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 71%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 70/100Snow reliabilityVery highSki area142 km · 2,101 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m57%Best transfer441 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,800+ m
Strengths
  • Good terrain match · 70/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
  • Good reliability match · 74/100 — led by strong snow resilience..
Consider

Access is a relative compromise.

Gossensass

#6 · Rosskopf Sterzing · Italy

Decision55/100
Fit55/100
Now0/100
Quality3.5/10
Now00 cm freshReliability5757/100Terrain5454/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit55.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision55.1/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow57/100 · 37% evidence 15.6 / 27.3 pts
Terrain62/100 · 52% evidence 15.5 / 25.0 pts
Scale62/100 · 100% evidence 11.3 / 18.2 pts
Lift system24/100 · 68% evidence 3.9 / 15.9 pts
Family & value66/100 · 41% evidence 8.9 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeBalanced all-rounderBest useAdvanced skiing · 57/100Snow reliabilityMarginalSki area20 km · 1,172 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 54/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Solid reliability match · 57/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Altastenberg

#7 · Winterberg · Germany

Decision50/100
Fit50/100
Now0/100
Quality5.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability2121/100Terrain6161/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit50.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision50.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow21/100 · 37% evidence 5.6 / 27.3 pts
Terrain45/100 · 52% evidence 11.1 / 25.0 pts
Scale49/100 · 100% evidence 9.0 / 18.2 pts
Lift system81/100 · 68% evidence 12.8 / 15.9 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 11.5 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 60/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area28 km · 190 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 61/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 21/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Neuastenberg

#8 · Winterberg · Germany

Decision50/100
Fit50/100
Now0/100
Quality5.7/10
Now00 cm freshReliability2121/100Terrain6161/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit50.0100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision50.0/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow21/100 · 37% evidence 5.6 / 27.3 pts
Terrain45/100 · 52% evidence 11.1 / 25.0 pts
Scale49/100 · 100% evidence 9.0 / 18.2 pts
Lift system81/100 · 68% evidence 12.8 / 15.9 pts
Family & value85/100 · 41% evidence 11.5 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 51%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 60/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area28 km · 190 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Solid terrain match · 61/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 21/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Goulier

#9 · Goulier · France

Decision46/100
Fit46/100
Now0/100
Quality–/10
Now00 cm freshReliability4444/100Terrain4747/100
Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit46.2100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision46.2/100
Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow44/100 · 37% evidence 12.1 / 27.3 pts
Terrain44/100 · 44% evidence 10.9 / 25.0 pts
Scale31/100 · 100% evidence 5.6 / 18.2 pts
Lift system41/100 · 68% evidence 6.5 / 15.9 pts
Family & value82/100 · 41% evidence 11.1 / 13.6 pts
AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 49%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts
Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded
Mountain snowNo data excluded
Open terrainNo data excluded
Snow qualityNo data excluded
Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useFamily trips · 56/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area6 km · 327 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m
Strengths
  • Mixed terrain match · 47/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
  • Mixed reliability match · 44/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..
Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible
AttributeChamonixChamonix ValleyGrimentzGrimentz ZinalBreuil CerviniaMatterhorn Ski ParadiseBrussonMonte Rosa SkiSaasSaastalGossensassRosskopf SterzingAltastenbergWinterbergNeuastenbergWinterbergGoulierGoulier
Assessment
Decision score 75/100clear advantage67/10065/10064/10064/10055/10050/10050/10046/100
Structural Fit 82/100clear advantage67/10075/10064/10064/10055/10050/10050/10046/100
Current opportunity 29/1000/10025/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/1000/100
Overall quality 6.0/109.1/109.2/107.5/108.7/103.5/105.7/10Shared ski-area value–
Recommendation confidence MediumMediumMediumMediumMediumLowLowLowLow
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability 68/10067/10076/10055/10078/10048/10034/100Shared ski-area value30/100
Typical daytime high 3°C0°C-2°Cclear advantage2°C1°C4°C2°CShared ski-area value8°C
Typical snow/freezing level –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Typical overnight low -4°C-6°C-7°C-5°C-6°C-4°C-3°CShared ski-area value2°C
Rating 8.1/107.8/108.1/107.2/107.4/106.8/106.8/10Shared ski-area value4.8/10
Area size class 150–250 km100–150 km250+ km100–150 km100–150 km20 km or less20–50 kmShared ski-area value20 km or less
Ability profile advancedexpertadvancedadvancedadvancedadvancedintermediateShared ski-area valuenovice
Price class highhighhighlowhighavgavgShared ski-area value–
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes 175 km115 km322 kmclear advantage132 km142 km20 km28 kmShared ski-area value6 km
Lowest point 1,000 m1,570 m1,562 m1,212 m1,472 m948 m630 mShared ski-area value1,480 m
Highest point 3,842 m2,900 m3,899 m3,275 m3,573 m2,120 m820 mShared ski-area value1,807 m
Vertical range 2,842 mclear advantage1,330 m2,337 m2,063 m2,101 m1,172 m190 mShared ski-area value327 m
Blue pistes 34%23%23%22%22%30%51%Shared ski-area value67%
Red pistes 44%51%68%67%62%65%44%Shared ski-area value33%
Black pistes 22%26%8%11%16%5%5%Shared ski-area value0%
Terrain above 2,000 m 55%82%92%0%57%––Shared ski-area value–
Terrain above 3,000 m 0%0%21%clear advantage0%0%––Shared ski-area value–
Piste-mix diversity 97/10094/10074/10076/10084/10072/10079/100Shared ski-area value92/100
Slope-angle diversity 86/100clear advantage73/10051/10033/10068/100––Shared ski-area value–
Very/extremely steep terrain 21%clear advantage11%6%2%2%––Shared ski-area value–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Typical early-winter mountain depth –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Typical core-winter mountain depth –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Typical late-winter mountain depth –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Snow consistency –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Late-winter retention –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Lower-mountain retention –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Warm-winter resilience –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Mountain snow versus typical Well above typical+109% vs average · 92th percentile–Below typical-20% vs average · 23th percentile––––––
Valley snow versus typical ––Below typical-41% vs average · 57th percentile––––––
Open slopes versus typical ––Close to typical-21% vs average · 45th percentile––––––
Current snow
Valley snow 30 cm–19 cm––––––
Mid-mountain snow 97 cmclear advantage–68 cm––––––
Mountain snow 142 cmclear advantage–100 cm––––––
Fresh snow 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Snow quality ––9.6/10––––––
Snow alert 0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes ––7%––––––
Open lifts –––––––––
Lift capacity per piste km 556 pph/km210 pph/km298 pph/km266 pph/km289 pph/km315 pph/km1,812 pph/kmShared ski-area value419 pph/km
Lift-system coverage 0.48×clear advantage0.20×0.28×0.24×0.28×0.25×0.33×Shared ski-area value0.32×
Terrain per lift 2.5 km/lift5.5 km/lift6.3 km/lift6.3 km/lift3.6 km/lift6.7 km/lift1.1 km/liftShared ski-area value1.5 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature 2°C1°C-7°C1°C-2°C2°C4°C4°C4°C
Maximum temperature 9°C8°C-5°C6°C6°C12°C10°C9°C13°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability –family––family–familyShared ski-area value–
Piste variety slopesslopesslopesslopesslopes––Shared ski-area value–
Off-piste offpisteoffpisteoffpisteoffpiste–––Shared ski-area value–
Cross-country –––––––Shared ski-area value–
Lift network ––lifts–lifts––Shared ski-area value–
Mountain restaurants ––restaurants–restaurants––Shared ski-area value–
Après-ski ––apresski–apresski–apresskiShared ski-area value–
Public transport transit–transittransit–transit–Shared ski-area value–
Best airport transfer 63 min132 min104 min80 min441 min––––
Skiing per transfer hour 166 km/h transfer52 km/h transfer186 km/h transfer99 km/h transfer19 km/h transfer––––