Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Champex is the strongest match because of mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bugnenets is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Narrow lead

Champex

56/100

Why

Champex is the strongest match because of mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence. Bugnenets is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier. 1 option have limited evidence coverage.

Limited evidenceUpdated 19 h ago

Structural fit score: 56/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeBugnenets

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Champex

Family progression baseLow-regret choiceNarrow lead

Leads on mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.

Why Champex leads Bugnenets Snow reliability +9.0 pts and Access +5.8 pts

Snow reliability +9.0Terrain fit -8.8Access +5.8

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeBugnenets

Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.

What could change the resultReduce snow weight from 24 to 10 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

Lead margin6.2pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence64%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?

These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.

SnowBugnenets

Reduce snow weight from 24 to 10 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

24 → 10

Lift systemBugnenets

Increase lift system weight from 14 to 70 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

14 → 70

TerrainBugnenets

Increase terrain weight from 22 to 98 and Bugnenets becomes the leading option.

22 → 98

Why Champex leads Bugnenets · 6.2 pts

Snow+9.0 pts

Access+5.8 pts

Terrain-3.6 pts

Lift system-2.4 pts

Scale-2.3 pts

Family & value-0.5 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Champex

#1 · Champex · Switzerland

Decision56/100

Fit56/100

Now0/100

Quality9.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability7575/100Terrain5050/100Access48106 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit56.1100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision56.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow75/100 · 37% evidence 18.0 / 24.0 pts

Terrain60/100 · 52% evidence 13.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale51/100 · 100% evidence 8.1 / 16.0 pts

Lift system9/100 · 68% evidence 1.2 / 14.0 pts

Access48/100 · 68% evidence 5.8 / 12.0 pts

Family & value82/100 · 41% evidence 9.8 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily progression baseBest useSnow-first trips · 62/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area15 km · 726 m verticalBest transfer106 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Mixed terrain match · 50/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Bugnenets

#2 · Bugnenets-Savagnieres · Switzerland

Decision50/100

Fit50/100

Now0/100

Quality4.8/10

Now00 cm freshReliability3333/100Terrain5656/100

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit49.9100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision49.9/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow33/100 · 37% evidence 9.0 / 27.3 pts

Terrain67/100 · 52% evidence 16.7 / 25.0 pts

Scale57/100 · 85% evidence 10.4 / 18.2 pts

Lift system22/100 · 68% evidence 3.6 / 15.9 pts

Family & value75/100 · 41% evidence 10.3 / 13.6 pts

AccessNo data excluded

Data coverage: 48%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeFamily-led destinationBest useAdvanced skiing · 54/100Snow reliabilityLowSki area30 km · 371 m verticalCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top <2,000 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 56/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Mixed reliability match · 33/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Snow resilience is less distinctive.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	ChampexChampex	BugnenetsBugnenets-Savagnieres
Assessment
Decision score	56/100clear advantage	50/100
Structural Fit	56/100clear advantage	50/100
Current opportunity	0/100	0/100
Overall quality	9.0/10clear advantage	4.8/10
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Low
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	84/100clear advantage	29/100
Typical daytime high	2°C	2°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-7°Cclear advantage	-4°C
Rating	6.4/10	6.8/10clear advantage
Area size class	20 km or less	20–50 km
Ability profile	novice	expert
Price class	high	high
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	15 km	30 km
Lowest point	1,468 mclear advantage	1,078 m
Highest point	2,194 mclear advantage	1,449 m
Vertical range	726 mclear advantage	371 m
Blue pistes	70%	33%
Red pistes	20%	33%
Black pistes	10%	33%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m	–	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	–	–
Piste-mix diversity	73/100	100/100clear advantage
Slope-angle diversity	–	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	–	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	–
Mid-mountain snow	–	–
Mountain snow	–	–
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	167 pph/km	252 pph/kmclear advantage
Lift-system coverage	0.19×	0.24×
Terrain per lift	3.8 km/lift	3.8 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	7°C	10°C
Maximum temperature	17°C	16°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	–	family
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	–
Mountain restaurants	–	–
Après-ski	–	–
Public transport	–	–
Best airport transfer	106 min	–
Skiing per transfer hour	8 km/h transfer	–

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Champex

Champex

Resort overview

Champex

Bugnenets

Detailed comparison