Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Alpe dHuez is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, exceptional reliability match · 88/100 — led by strong snow resilience. La Norma is the strongest alternative.

Recommended

Alpe dHuez

73/100

Why

Alpe dHuez is the strongest match because of good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, exceptional reliability match · 88/100 — led by strong snow resilience. La Norma is the strongest alternative.

Mixed evidenceUpdated 19 h ago

Strong structural fit for the selected priorities (79/100).

AlternativeLa Norma

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifA material forecast shift or a different priority profile could change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Alpe dHuez

Large-domain explorerLow-regret choice

Leads on good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, exceptional reliability match · 88/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Alpe dHuez leads La Norma Terrain fit +11.0 pts and Snow reliability +3.1 pts

Terrain fit +11.0Snow now -4.4Snow reliability +3.1Access +1.6

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeLa Norma

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIf immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, La Norma becomes the stronger option.

Lead margin11.3pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence74%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier1 option

1 option is dominated on commonly available dimensions.

Why Alpe dHuez leads La Norma · 11.3 pts

Current opportunity-4.4 pts

Lift system+4.2 pts

Terrain+3.6 pts

Snow+3.1 pts

Scale+2.0 pts

Access+1.6 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?

Immediate conditionsLa Norma

If immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, La Norma becomes the stronger option.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Alpe dHuez

#1 · Alpe dHuez Grand Domaine · France

Decision73/100

Fit79/100

Now11/100

Quality7.7/10

Now1150 cm upperReliability8888/100Terrain7575/100Access7782 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit78.592% weight Now10.98% weight Decision73.1/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow88/100 · 73% evidence 21.1 / 24.0 pts

Terrain86/100 · 80% evidence 18.8 / 22.0 pts

Scale90/100 · 100% evidence 14.4 / 16.0 pts

Lift system47/100 · 68% evidence 6.6 / 14.0 pts

Access77/100 · 68% evidence 9.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value70/100 · 41% evidence 8.4 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow50 cm 10.9 / 65.2 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 34.8 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 46%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useSnow-first trips · 81/100Snow reliabilityExceptionalSki area250 km · 2,205 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer82 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group150–299 km · Top 2,800+ m

Strengths

Good terrain match · 75/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Exceptional reliability match · 88/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

La Norma

#2 · La Norma · France

Decision62/100

Fit66/100

Now38/100

Quality7.2/10

Now38190 cm upperReliability7979/100Terrain6161/100Access6687 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit65.586% weight Now38.414% weight Decision61.8/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow79/100 · 37% evidence 18.9 / 24.0 pts

Terrain72/100 · 52% evidence 15.9 / 22.0 pts

Scale81/100 · 100% evidence 13.0 / 16.0 pts

Lift system16/100 · 68% evidence 2.2 / 14.0 pts

Access66/100 · 68% evidence 7.9 / 12.0 pts

Family & value63/100 · 41% evidence 7.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 59%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow190 cm 27.1 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow40 cm 5.1 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow130 cm 6.2 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useSnow-first trips · 69/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area65 km · 1,394 m verticalBest transfer87 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Solid terrain match · 61/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Strong reliability match · 79/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	Alpe dHuezAlpe dHuez Grand Domaine	La NormaLa Norma
Assessment
Decision score	73/100clear advantage	62/100
Structural Fit	79/100clear advantage	66/100
Current opportunity	11/100	38/100clear advantage
Overall quality	7.7/10clear advantage	7.2/10
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	82/100clear advantage	68/100
Typical daytime high	2°C	2°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-4°C	-5°C
Rating	7.2/10	6.9/10
Area size class	150–250 km	50–100 km
Ability profile	advanced	advanced
Price class	high	low
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	250 kmclear advantage	65 km
Lowest point	1,125 m	1,352 mclear advantage
Highest point	3,330 mclear advantage	2,746 m
Vertical range	2,205 mclear advantage	1,394 m
Blue pistes	28%	26%
Red pistes	52%	66%
Black pistes	20%clear advantage	8%
Terrain above 2,000 m	55%	–
Terrain above 3,000 m	2%	–
Piste-mix diversity	93/100clear advantage	75/100
Slope-angle diversity	68/100	–
Very/extremely steep terrain	12%	–
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	–
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	40 cm
Mid-mountain snow	–	130 cm
Mountain snow	50 cm	190 cmclear advantage
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	1 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	440 pph/kmclear advantage	238 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	0.24×clear advantage	0.15×
Terrain per lift	3.6 km/lift	5.0 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	7°C	8°C
Maximum temperature	15°C	14°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	family
Piste variety	slopes	–
Off-piste	offpiste	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	–
Mountain restaurants	restaurants	–
Après-ski	apresski	–
Public transport	transit	transit
Best airport transfer	82 min	87 min
Skiing per transfer hour	183 km/h transferclear advantage	45 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Alpe dHuez

Alpe dHuez

Resort overview

Alpe dHuez

La Norma

Detailed comparison