Pelvoux Vallouise
Effectively tied with Meran 2000. solid terrain match · 57/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, solid reliability match · 60/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.
Strongest alternativeMeran 2000
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Meran 2000 is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
What could change the resultReduce access weight from 12 to 7 and Meran 2000 becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Reduce access weight from 12 to 7 and Meran 2000 becomes the leading option.
Increase lift system weight from 14 to 23 and Meran 2000 becomes the leading option.
Reduce family & value weight from 12 to 3 and Meran 2000 becomes the leading option.
Increase snow weight from 24 to 50 and Meran 2000 becomes the leading option.
Why Pelvoux Vallouise leads Meran 2000 · 1.4 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.