Sierre
Effectively tied with Les Aillons. solid terrain match · 57/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, good reliability match · 64/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.
Strongest alternativeLes Aillons
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Les Aillons is small. Most of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
What could change the resultIncrease access weight from 12 to 17 and Les Aillons becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Increase access weight from 12 to 17 and Les Aillons becomes the leading option.
Increase lift system weight from 14 to 19 and Les Aillons becomes the leading option.
Reduce terrain weight from 22 to 14 and Les Aillons becomes the leading option.
Reduce scale weight from 16 to 7 and Les Aillons becomes the leading option.
Why Sierre leads Les Aillons · 1.4 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.