Mitterbach am Erlaufsee
Effectively tied with Les Haberes. solid terrain match · 55/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale, mixed reliability match · 43/100 — led by strong snow resilience.
Strongest alternativeLes Haberes
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
What could change the resultReduce family & value weight from 12 to 1 and Les Haberes becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Reduce family & value weight from 12 to 1 and Les Haberes becomes the leading option.
Increase lift system weight from 14 to 26 and Les Haberes becomes the leading option.
Reduce snow weight from 24 to 4 and Les Haberes becomes the leading option.
Increase scale weight from 16 to 36 and Les Haberes becomes the leading option.
Why Mitterbach am Erlaufsee leads Les Haberes · 3.0 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.