Vallter 2000
Leads on solid terrain match · 63/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, strong reliability match · 78/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence.
Strongest alternativeGerlitzen
Main uncertaintySome requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
What could change the resultIncrease scale weight from 16 to 36 and Gerlitzen becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Increase scale weight from 16 to 36 and Gerlitzen becomes the leading option.
Increase terrain weight from 22 to 84 and Gerlitzen becomes the leading option.
Increase lift system weight from 14 to 81 and Gerlitzen becomes the leading option.
Why Vallter 2000 leads Gerlitzen · 5.1 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.