Helm
Effectively tied with Petzen. good terrain match · 68/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, mixed reliability match · 45/100 — led by strong snow resilience—but the result is close.
Strongest alternativePetzen
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Petzen is small. Some requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
What could change the resultReduce lift system weight from 14 to 10 and Petzen becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–2.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
1 option is dominated on commonly available dimensions.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 10 and Petzen becomes the leading option.
Increase family & value weight from 12 to 23 and Petzen becomes the leading option.
Increase terrain weight from 22 to 42 and Petzen becomes the leading option.
Increase snow weight from 24 to 48 and Petzen becomes the leading option.
Why Helm leads Petzen · 1.8 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.