Jungholz (A)
Effectively tied with Serfaus Fiss Ladis. good terrain match · 76/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 53/100 — led by strong snow resilience; partial evidence—but the result is close.
Strongest alternativeSerfaus Fiss Ladis
Main uncertaintyThe lead over Serfaus Fiss Ladis is small. Some requested evidence is unavailable; the score is rescaled over the evidence that exists.
What could change the resultReduce lift system weight from 14 to 10 and Serfaus Fiss Ladis becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 10 and Serfaus Fiss Ladis becomes the leading option.
Reduce access weight from 12 to 5 and Serfaus Fiss Ladis becomes the leading option.
Increase snow weight from 24 to 34 and Serfaus Fiss Ladis becomes the leading option.
Increase terrain weight from 22 to 32 and Serfaus Fiss Ladis becomes the leading option.
Why Jungholz (A) leads Serfaus Fiss Ladis · 1.6 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.