La Rosiere
Effectively tied with Ortler. strong terrain match · 86/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, good reliability match · 75/100 — led by strong snow resilience.
Strongest alternativeOrtler
Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.
What could change the resultReduce lift system weight from 14 to 5 and Ortler becomes the leading option.
Difference between the first and second option.
The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.
Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.
Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions
No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.
Explore decision boundaries · what preference change flips the winner?
These are the smallest tested single-dimension changes that produce a different leader. Apply one to inspect that scenario; no new database query is required to calculate the boundary.
Reduce lift system weight from 14 to 5 and Ortler becomes the leading option.
Reduce access weight from 12 to 3 and Ortler becomes the leading option.
Increase snow weight from 24 to 41 and Ortler becomes the leading option.
Increase family & value weight from 12 to 44 and Ortler becomes the leading option.
Why La Rosiere leads Ortler · 3.5 pts
Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.