Compare ski resorts

Recommendation

Decision summary

Leysin is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 78/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Kappl im Paznauntal is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Recommended

Leysin

72/100

Why

Leysin is the strongest match because of strong terrain match · 78/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience. Kappl im Paznauntal is the strongest alternative. 2 options remain on the Pareto frontier.

Limited evidenceUpdated 20 h ago

Structural fit score: 72/100.

Evidence coverage is limited; the ranking may move with new observations.

AlternativeKappl im Paznauntal

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

Would change ifFresh observations or stronger source agreement could materially change the ranking.

Detailed comparison reasoningEvidence bridge, trade-offs and decision boundaries

Recommended for this profile

Leysin

Large-domain explorerLow-regret choice

Leads on strong terrain match · 78/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence, solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience.

Why Leysin leads Kappl im Paznauntal Terrain fit +13.3 pts and Access +0.1 pts

Terrain fit +13.3Snow now -2.7Snow reliability -0.8Access +0.1

Incoming snow and Weather stay in the forecast layer unless current/forecast evidence is explicitly part of the Decision score.

Strongest alternativeKappl im Paznauntal

Main uncertaintyMost of the evidence requested by this priority profile is available.

What could change the resultIf immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Kappl im Paznauntal becomes the stronger option.

Lead margin9.8pts

Difference between the first and second option.

Ranking stabilityHigh100%

The ranking changes little under nearby priority weights. Rank range 1–1.

Evidence confidence67%

Coverage and coherence of evidence used by this comparison.

Advanced analysisSensitivity, Pareto trade-offs and score contributions

Pareto frontier2 options

No selected option is clearly dominated on the shared evidence.

Why Leysin leads Kappl im Paznauntal · 9.8 pts

Lift system+7.4 pts

Family & value+4.4 pts

Current opportunity-2.7 pts

Scale+2.2 pts

Snow-0.8 pts

Terrain-0.7 pts

Point contributions reconcile the structural Fit dimensions and confidence-limited current opportunity. Missing evidence is not treated as zero.

Priority sensitivity · what can change the winner?

Immediate conditionsKappl im Paznauntal

If immediate snow and opening conditions dominate the decision, Kappl im Paznauntal becomes the stronger option.

More comparison leadersAdditional category leaders

Resort overview

Trip match is profile-specific. Expand the calculation to see exactly how each score is built.

Leysin

#1 · Leysin Les Mosses · Switzerland

Decision72/100

Fit72/100

Now0/100

Quality9.0/10

Now00 cm freshReliability5656/100Terrain7878/100Access6893 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit71.5100% weight Now0.00% weight Decision71.5/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow56/100 · 73% evidence 13.4 / 24.0 pts

Terrain64/100 · 80% evidence 14.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale86/100 · 85% evidence 13.7 / 16.0 pts

Lift system86/100 · 8% evidence 12.1 / 14.0 pts

Access68/100 · 68% evidence 8.2 / 12.0 pts

Family & value84/100 · 41% evidence 10.1 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 63%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 100.0 pts

Mid-mountain snowNo data excluded

Mountain snowNo data excluded

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Valley snowNo data excluded

Data coverage: 16%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useFamily trips · 74/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area100 km · 952 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m8%Best transfer93 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group50–149 km · Top 2,000–2,799 m

Strengths

Strong terrain match · 78/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale; partial evidence..
Solid reliability match · 56/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Kappl im Paznauntal

#2 · Kappl im Paznauntal · Austria

Decision62/100

Fit68/100

Now20/100

Quality8.5/10

Now2085 cm upperReliability6868/100Terrain6666/100Access7871 min

Decision score composition

Fit remains the structural anchor. Current opportunity receives weight only when current evidence is available, covered and fresh; otherwise Decision falls back toward Fit.

Fit68.386% weight Now19.714% weight Decision61.7/100

Structural Fit calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Snow68/100 · 73% evidence 16.4 / 24.0 pts

Terrain78/100 · 80% evidence 17.1 / 22.0 pts

Scale83/100 · 100% evidence 13.3 / 16.0 pts

Lift system39/100 · 68% evidence 5.4 / 14.0 pts

Access78/100 · 68% evidence 9.4 / 12.0 pts

Family & value55/100 · 41% evidence 6.6 / 12.0 pts

Data coverage: 74%

Current-opportunity calculation

Missing evidence is unknown, never zero. Available dimensions are rescaled to 100%; evidence coverage remains visible separately.

Mountain snow85 cm 12.1 / 42.9 pts

Fresh snow0 cm 0.0 / 22.9 pts

Valley snow35 cm 4.4 / 22.9 pts

Mid-mountain snow65 cm 3.1 / 11.4 pts

Open terrainNo data excluded

Snow qualityNo data excluded

Data coverage: 70%

Destination typeLarge-domain explorerBest useAdvanced skiing · 71/100Snow reliabilityHighSki area36 km · 1,510 m verticalTerrain >2,000 m55%Best transfer71 minCurrent dataUpdated for selected datePeer group<50 km · Top 2,000–2,799 mCalendar contextMountain snow is 48% above the available five-year level for this point in the season.

Strengths

Good terrain match · 66/100 — led by strong terrain profile and substantial ski-area scale..
Good reliability match · 68/100 — led by strong snow resilience..

Consider

Lift-system evidence is less convincing.

Side-by-side evidence

Detailed comparison

Structural snow resilience uses the multi-winter early/core/late archive after daily de-duplication. Calendar-date rows separately compare current observations with the previous five years. Missing archive evidence remains unknown.

Find column

Scroll horizontally to compare resortsThe attribute column stays visible

Attribute	LeysinLeysin Les Mosses	Kappl im PaznauntalKappl im Paznauntal
Assessment
Decision score	72/100clear advantage	62/100
Structural Fit	72/100	68/100
Current opportunity	0/100	20/100clear advantage
Overall quality	9.0/10clear advantage	8.5/10
Recommendation confidence	Medium	Medium
Ski-area profile
Historical snow reliability	60/100	70/100clear advantage
Typical daytime high	1°C	1°C
Typical snow/freezing level	–	–
Typical overnight low	-5°C	-6°C
Rating	7.3/10clear advantage	6.5/10
Area size class	50–100 km	20–50 km
Ability profile	novice	advanced
Price class	high	avg
Terrain and altitude
Marked pistes	100 kmclear advantage	36 km
Lowest point	1,253 m	1,180 m
Highest point	2,205 m	2,690 mclear advantage
Vertical range	952 m	1,510 mclear advantage
Blue pistes	66%	17%
Red pistes	30%	64%
Black pistes	4%	19%clear advantage
Terrain above 2,000 m	8%	55%clear advantage
Terrain above 3,000 m	0%	0%
Piste-mix diversity	70/100	82/100clear advantage
Slope-angle diversity	59/100	58/100
Very/extremely steep terrain	7%	6%
Historical context
Historical snow resilience	–	–
Typical early-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical core-winter mountain depth	–	–
Typical late-winter mountain depth	–	–
Snow consistency	–	–
Late-winter retention	–	–
Lower-mountain retention	–	–
Warm-winter resilience	–	–
Mountain snow versus typical	–	Above typical+48% vs average · 69th percentile
Valley snow versus typical	–	–
Open slopes versus typical	–	–
Current snow
Valley snow	–	35 cm
Mid-mountain snow	–	65 cm
Mountain snow	–	85 cm
Fresh snow	0 cm	0 cm
Snow quality	–	–
Snow alert	0 cm	0 cm
Open terrain and lifts
Open slopes	–	–
Open lifts	–	–
Lift capacity per piste km	–	439 pph/km
Lift-system coverage	–	0.23×
Terrain per lift	3.6 km/lift	3.6 km/lift
Weather
Minimum temperature	7°C	8°C
Maximum temperature	15°C	15°C
Suitability and facilities
Family suitability	family	family
Piste variety	–	–
Off-piste	–	–
Cross-country	–	–
Lift network	–	lifts
Mountain restaurants	–	–
Après-ski	–	–
Public transport	transit	transit
Best airport transfer	93 min	71 minclear advantage
Skiing per transfer hour	65 km/h transferclear advantage	30 km/h transfer

Shape the comparison

Start a comparison

Decision summary

Leysin

Leysin

Resort overview

Leysin

Kappl im Paznauntal

Detailed comparison